Theatre 3900

Sunday 13 March 2011

The Importance of Being Earnest

Oscar Wilde was an Irish Poet/Playwright in the second half of the 19th century. His writing skill, as well as his somewhat flamboyant mode of dress and charming wit, quickly made him one of the most recognizable faces in British high society. The Importance of Being Earnest premiered during the height of Wilde’s career on February 14, 1895 at the St. James Theatre in London to general goods reviews. Many critics recognized that the play was undoubtedly clever (and popular with audience members), but most were frustrated with the fact that it did not really touch on any important political or social issues. While this is true, the play does have an interesting commentary on Victorian high society and even goes so far as to mock marriage, a very highly regarded social institution at the time.

“The Well-Made Play” is a genre developed by the French dramatist Eugene Scribe in the early 19th century. Two of the major features in it are a quick conclusion after the climax of the play and the use of misplaced papers to bring about plot twists. Wilde exaggerates both of these themes in Earnest. The missing papers concept is exaggerated when the play’s protagonist, Jack (Earnest), is mistaken for the manuscript of a novel and misplaced. Furthermore, the play itself closes very sharply after the final climactic revelation that Jack is, in fact, Algernon’s brother.

The Staging of this play can be seen as the climactic point in Wilde’s career as an artist, but it was also the beginning of his downfall. On February 18, 1895, Wilde was accused by John Douglas, the Marquees of Queensberry and the father of Wilde’s lover, fellow poet Alfred Douglas, of “gross indecency with another man” or sodomy, a federal offense in Britain at the time. Wilde was publicly humiliated during this trial as not only did it expose his relationship with many male prostitutes, but the verdict also left him completely bankrupt. Soon after this first trial, the crown took Wilde to court only a few weeks later on the same charges and Wilde was imprisoned for two years. After being released, Wilde found himself cast out of English society and fled to France where he spent the last 3 years of his life living in extreme poverty under an assumed name.

1. Many people have pointed out that the names “Earnest” was a euphemism for homosexual in Victorian England and have used that claim that the play had a homosexual subtext. Do you think that this is true?

2. Do you think that it is necessary for a play to involve the discussion of “serious social or political issues?” Why or why not?

3. Many of the social pretenses the Wilde pokes fun at were based either in large or small part in Christianity (marriage, Christening, etc.). Yet, on his deathbed, Wilde officially converted to Roman Catholicism. How can these two facts be justified?

4. Do you think that this play, which was written as a satire of Victorian era high society England, has any relevance in modern day, 21st century America?

5. Do you think there is any significance to Wilde setting the play in “the present” rather than saying 1895 or so?

6. One of the major themes of the play is the triviality of high society. What is the significance of Lady Bracknell’s last line, “My nephew, you seem to be displaying signs of triviality?” What, exactly, is she referring to?

7. One of the things that make this play so endearing to audiences is the dialogue, which is full of witticisms and contradictions. Discuss some examples of dialogue where this is evident and why you think Oscar Wilde included them.

8. Do you think that the exaggeration of the Well-Made Play is significant to Earnest?

12 comments:

  1. -Do you think that it is necessary for a play to involve the discussion of “serious social or political issues?” Why or why not?
    __________________________________

    I think it is necessary for the play to embody whatever it is the playwright wishes to accomplish in writing it. If the play happens to discuss of serious or social political issues, then so be it.

    "They" say acting is actively trying to change someone or something in order to achieve one's objective; whether in physical action, or mental manipulation (note: manipulation is not always a bad thing.) "Tactics" are used to gain whatever it is the character is trying to accomplish.

    I believe the same theory applies to the playwright; they write about what is important to them. This applies to some plays more than others, depending on how badly the playwright wishes to see a difference in the way society functions.

    Using wit and and obvious contradictions as his "action" in The Importance of Being Earnest made people in Wilde's world pay attention to the social issues at hand.

    Consider the play on words within the title of the play. Jack's alter-ego is Ernest, namesake of the play, or easily mistaken as such. The spelling of "Earnest" in the title implies the actual term meaning:

    "full seriousness, as of intention or purpose: to speak in earnest." (dictionary.com)

    Isn't that what this play is about? The characters in this play rarely ever speak in earnest; saying only what benefits their social standard of living. Jack is ESPECIALLY guilty of this; as he goes by his real name when he wants to appear to have a sense of duty/honor/respectability, yet he goes by "Ernest" when he wants to live by the opposite standards. -Being very careful to keep the two separate in order to save face.

    In choosing the specific spelling of "Earnest" in the title, Wilde brings the theme of social hypocrisy to the forefront. Genius!

    This is the first tactic I noticed in Wilde's composition of the Importance of Being Earnest. The play is his means of addressing what bothers him, necessary or not.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I didn’t finish the play yet but I like it. It reminds me of several different t.v. shows that portrayed similar themes for their episodes and all of them were hilarious. It also brought back memories of things me and my friends did that were similar to this, but not to the extreme. The characters are crazy and I wish I would’ve been here for the production everyone was talking about (then I would’ve seen the cat fight haha). Overall, I think it’s clever, funny and one of those plays I’ll remember beyond this semester.
    2. Do you think that it is necessary for a play to involve the discussion of “serious social or political issues?” Why or why not?
    I think that some type of issue has to be present for a play to be a play. Plays, movies, novels, etc. are all stories and every story needs a conflict (unless it’s educational or wack). It doesn’t have to be a social or political problem but I think those are the easiest to portray and to understand.
    4. Do you think that this play, which was written as a satire of Victorian era high society England, has any relevance in modern day, 21st century America? 5. Do you think there is any significance to Wilde setting the play in “the present” rather than saying 1895 or so?
    I put my answers for questions 4 and 5 together because they’re kind of in the same boat. I think there is significance with the setting being “the present” because although it was set during the Victorian era, the actions in the play and the play itself can take place at anytime, anywhere and pretty much still get its point across. Relevance, I’m not too sure of, but I certainly believe that it can be applied to our everyday lives, maybe not literally but figuratively.

    ReplyDelete
  3. For some odd reason the computer would not let me open the play it was saying something about it was damaged, idk. But seeing a scene from the play in my Theatre 2025 helped me remember. From seeing the girls do it, I thought it was funny and quite interesting how women back in the day killed each other with kindness. Whereas women are freaking ruthless, we would do anything imaginable to get back at one another. But yeah that was all I had to say.

    ReplyDelete
  4. (Sorry I meant women in today's society)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bianca,

    Go to the library and get a copy of the play. I'm including it on the mid-term. Although I include the play texts on Moodle, you've got to make sure the files work ahead of time so that when something like this happens you can get the script some other way.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 3. Many of the social pretenses the Wilde pokes fun at were based either in large or small part in Christianity (marriage, Christening, etc.). Yet, on his deathbed, Wilde officially converted to Roman Catholicism. How can these two facts be justified?

    If he spent the last few years of his life alone, living in poverty in France... then why not convert to Roman Catholicism? Certainly couldn't hurt. That's how the early Christians did it. They knew they'd end up sinning so they held off on baptism until they were on their deathbeds. Maybe he thought that God was punishing him by going through the trails, jail, and being outcasted from England because he poked fun at Christianity, and the only way he could be absolved from it was to convert. Or maybe he thought it would ease his earthly pain if he converted and could have a comfortable eternal afterlife.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Just finished reading the play and all I can say is wooowwww. I love it when a plan comes together, even when it's not the way you planned.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I really loved this play. The subtitle "A trivial comedy for serious people," really interested me and engaged me in the plot of the show. Wilde's idea to take such a trivial matter to comment on a serious topic is a very interesting way to influence social reform. It makes me wonder if the audience during the initial run of the show, caught on to what he was doing. Most people who went to the theater were upper class people so i feel that if they were to catch on they would have been mildly put off by what he was saying.
    Also, I am from uptown new orleans and have a very typical uptown family. If i were to set this today, i could just cast my family as the characters because they (we) are the type of people who care about trivial nothingness and make it a big deal

    ReplyDelete
  9. 5. I think the play is set in the present so that when you read/watch it you take the satire as a critique to the society that you live in presently. Although it was written in the 1800s, this play still tackles issues today(particularly in the south)and by reading it like it is happening now, Wilde encourages you to question the world around you.For example, the play talks a lot about the "trivial" things and it made me think about all the stupid stuff I put first in life, like facebook. It makes the play more relateable. In fact, it made me imagine people I know as the characters, and brought it close to home.

    -hannah

    ReplyDelete
  10. You know, we kept talking in class about how the play was about trivial things, and I find it interesting that it manages to make some rather big issues trivial. The big thing for me is switching a baby and a manuscript, and then the leaving of the handbag the baby was in at a train station. I feel that normally if that was in a play it would be focused on more and be a bigger deal. While it’s the pivotal point in this play that allows it to end and wrap up nicely, the characters act kind of blasé about the whole thing as if that happens all the time (I don’t believe stuff like that happened all the time but if it did, wow, and way to go Oscar Wilde for pointing that out and making fun of it as well) and merely gloss over it and go back to talking about marriage and who is 'Ernest'. I just found that whole thing rather interesting and keeping true to the play’s trivial nature, because if that was the main focus of the play I feel like the satire and meaning in it would be lost under that plot.

    ReplyDelete
  11. 4. Do you think that this play, which was written as a satire of Victorian era high society England, has any relevance in modern day, 21st century America?

    I absolutely do! It is so closely related to the south. Just as Gwendolyn's mother grilled Jack on his credentials, so do my parents. The first thing my mother asks when I go on a date with a boy is where is he from and what he plans on doing for a living. I feel that the play would be easy to follow and enjoyable to watch if set in the present 21st century America. I think it could be set anywhere in America but more reasonably the south. The south would help emphasize Wilde's witty humor.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think this play has several meanings, most of which we discussed in class,but I think that it has to do with identity more than anything. Yes, it's funny and a satire and all of that, but I think that this play has a deep meaning rooted in it. The name thing was fun, but there's more to the play than the name or the meaning earnest. Unfortunately, I have to study right now so I'm cutting this short, but before I go I'd like to know if the man makes the name or the name makes the man? In this play the answer is obvious, but go deeper than what's written and think about it.

    ReplyDelete